Peer Assessment

Beattie-
1. Good Use of Lightning
2. I liked that you had both sides of the argument

1. I would say try and improve the volume on your interviewees

Bierbaum-
1. Good to go back and forth between interviewees and pictures
2. Nice use of experts

1. Should get the names of Interviewees correct

Chareonjitt-
1. Good use of live gaming feed
2. Good angle for the story

1. Should not cover interviewees faces

Hassan-
1. Nice Titles
2. Liked the live game

1. Should have increased volume for interviewees

Hengel-
1. Nice B-Roll
2. Liked the Titles

1. Should have the questions in story

Hernandez-
1. Liked that you used school official as well as student
2. Good that you asked multiple questions

1. Last B-roll did not relate very well

Hoffman-
1. Liked how you asked a question once and panned through interviewees
2. Liked the B-roll descriptions

1. Could have had more questions to ask

Kent-
1. Nice use of expert
2. Nice job with school kid

1. No sound with stand up

Keohavong-
1. Nice use of expert
2. Way to get both sides

1. Need to shorten the length

Kerber-
1. Nice use of B-roll
2. Nice Title

1. No Stand up, Or any other talking


Krueger-
1. Liked the live game
2. Good overlap in interviews

1. Contradicted the interviewees by saying they play good defense when they said they play no defense and all offense

Kuhn-
1. Liked that you used clips from the movie
2. Nice stand up closer trying to get people to attend

1. Could have gotten more interviews

McAlpine-
1. Good use of multiple interviews
2. Nice Titles

1. Could have cut some parts that were not needed

Meckley-
1. Good job getting multiple interviews
2. Liked the live video feed

1. Good have gotten a better angle or more in depth

Nystuen-
1.